L3 Networks · Framework
AI Governance Control Matrix
A practical framework for connecting AI governance requirements to the identity, network, application, data protection, and monitoring controls needed to enforce them.
AI governance is not achieved through policy alone. Organizations also need the technical ability to identify AI usage, control access, protect sensitive information, review integrations, and investigate incidents. This matrix provides a starting point for evaluating whether those capabilities are in place.
Know who is using AI
01Key Risk
Technical Controls
Evidence to Review
Leadership Question
Discover AI tools in use
02Key Risk
Technical Controls
Evidence to Review
Leadership Question
Protect sensitive data
03Key Risk
Technical Controls
Evidence to Review
Leadership Question
Control AI integrations
04Key Risk
Technical Controls
Evidence to Review
Leadership Question
Restrict unauthorized use
05Key Risk
Technical Controls
Evidence to Review
Leadership Question
Assess vendor risk
06Key Risk
Technical Controls
Evidence to Review
Leadership Question
Investigate AI-related incidents
07Key Risk
Technical Controls
Evidence to Review
Leadership Question
Demonstrate oversight
08Key Risk
Technical Controls
Evidence to Review
Leadership Question
| Governance Objective | Key Risk | Technical Controls | Evidence to Review | Leadership Question |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Know who is using AI | Users may access AI through personal accounts or unmanaged identities. | SSOMFAConditional AccessDevice Compliance | Sign-in logs, user assignments, device status, access review results | Can AI activity be tied to a managed user, device, location, and authentication method? |
| Discover AI tools in use | Shadow AI may operate outside approved software inventories. | CASBSecure Web GatewayDNS SecuritySaaS Discovery | Cloud application reports, DNS logs, web traffic, browser extension inventories | Can we identify both approved and unsanctioned AI services? |
| Protect sensitive data | Confidential or regulated data may be submitted through prompts, uploads, transcripts, or copied content. | DLPData ClassificationEndpoint ControlsBrowser Controls | DLP alerts, file activity, upload events, sensitivity labels, endpoint telemetry | Can we distinguish normal AI use from the exposure of sensitive information? |
| Control AI integrations | AI applications may receive excessive or tenant-wide permissions. | OAuth GovernanceApp Consent ControlsLeast PrivilegeAccess Reviews | Enterprise applications, service principals, delegated permissions, application permissions | Do we know which AI tools can access core systems and what permissions they hold? |
| Restrict unauthorized use | Employees may use unapproved tools despite policy restrictions. | Web FilteringGroup-Based PoliciesDevice RestrictionsSession Controls | Blocked application events, policy exceptions, device posture, web access logs | Can we apply different AI access policies by user, device, department, or risk level? |
| Assess vendor risk | AI vendors may retain, process, or reuse organizational data in ways that are not understood. | Vendor ReviewContract ControlsData Retention ReviewRisk Scoring | Security assessments, privacy terms, retention policies, subprocessors, contractual protections | Do we understand how every AI vendor handles our data? |
| Investigate AI-related incidents | Insufficient logging may prevent the organization from reconstructing an event. | SIEMIdentity LogsEndpoint TelemetrySaaS Audit Logs | Centralized logs, alert history, retention settings, incident response records | Could we determine who used an AI service, what data was involved, and when it occurred? |
| Demonstrate oversight | Leadership may lack consolidated reporting on AI adoption, risk, and remediation. | DashboardsRisk RegistersReview CadenceExecutive Reporting | AI inventory, risk ratings, open findings, owner assignments, remediation status | Can leadership see where AI is being used and where unresolved exposure remains? |
Leadership
Executive Readiness Questions
Leadership should be able to answer each of the following with confidence.
- Do we know which AI services are accessed from corporate devices and networks?
- Can we distinguish approved enterprise AI accounts from personal accounts?
- Do we know which AI tools have access to Microsoft 365 and other business platforms?
- Can we identify what sensitive data is being submitted to external AI services?
- Are AI-related OAuth permissions and integrations reviewed on a recurring basis?
- Can we enforce AI policies by user, department, device, data type, or risk level?
- Do we retain enough evidence to investigate an AI-related security or privacy incident?
- Does leadership receive consolidated reporting on AI adoption, risk, and remediation?
Roadmap
Suggested Implementation Roadmap
Phase 01
Establish Visibility
- Inventory AI applications and features
- Identify connected systems and permissions
- Review identity, web, DNS, and SaaS activity
- Document business owners and use cases
Phase 02
Apply Controls
- Define approved and restricted AI services
- Reduce excessive application permissions
- Apply identity, device, and data controls
- Complete vendor security and privacy reviews
Phase 03
Maintain Oversight
- Centralize AI-related monitoring and logs
- Review permissions and vendors regularly
- Track open findings and remediation
- Report AI adoption and risk to leadership
Key Takeaway
Policy alone is not governance
Policy defines acceptable AI use, but technical controls determine whether those expectations can be observed, enforced, and verified. Effective AI governance requires identity, network, application, data protection, vendor risk, and monitoring capabilities to work together.
Put the Matrix to Work
Pair this framework with a structured assessment, or talk with L3 about the controls that make AI governance enforceable.