L3 Networks · Framework

AI Governance Control Matrix

A practical framework for connecting AI governance requirements to the identity, network, application, data protection, and monitoring controls needed to enforce them.

AI governance is not achieved through policy alone. Organizations also need the technical ability to identify AI usage, control access, protect sensitive information, review integrations, and investigate incidents. This matrix provides a starting point for evaluating whether those capabilities are in place.

Know who is using AI

01

Key Risk

Users may access AI through personal accounts or unmanaged identities.

Technical Controls

SSOMFAConditional AccessDevice Compliance

Evidence to Review

Sign-in logs, user assignments, device status, access review results

Leadership Question

Can AI activity be tied to a managed user, device, location, and authentication method?

Discover AI tools in use

02

Key Risk

Shadow AI may operate outside approved software inventories.

Technical Controls

CASBSecure Web GatewayDNS SecuritySaaS Discovery

Evidence to Review

Cloud application reports, DNS logs, web traffic, browser extension inventories

Leadership Question

Can we identify both approved and unsanctioned AI services?

Protect sensitive data

03

Key Risk

Confidential or regulated data may be submitted through prompts, uploads, transcripts, or copied content.

Technical Controls

DLPData ClassificationEndpoint ControlsBrowser Controls

Evidence to Review

DLP alerts, file activity, upload events, sensitivity labels, endpoint telemetry

Leadership Question

Can we distinguish normal AI use from the exposure of sensitive information?

Control AI integrations

04

Key Risk

AI applications may receive excessive or tenant-wide permissions.

Technical Controls

OAuth GovernanceApp Consent ControlsLeast PrivilegeAccess Reviews

Evidence to Review

Enterprise applications, service principals, delegated permissions, application permissions

Leadership Question

Do we know which AI tools can access core systems and what permissions they hold?

Restrict unauthorized use

05

Key Risk

Employees may use unapproved tools despite policy restrictions.

Technical Controls

Web FilteringGroup-Based PoliciesDevice RestrictionsSession Controls

Evidence to Review

Blocked application events, policy exceptions, device posture, web access logs

Leadership Question

Can we apply different AI access policies by user, device, department, or risk level?

Assess vendor risk

06

Key Risk

AI vendors may retain, process, or reuse organizational data in ways that are not understood.

Technical Controls

Vendor ReviewContract ControlsData Retention ReviewRisk Scoring

Evidence to Review

Security assessments, privacy terms, retention policies, subprocessors, contractual protections

Leadership Question

Do we understand how every AI vendor handles our data?

Investigate AI-related incidents

07

Key Risk

Insufficient logging may prevent the organization from reconstructing an event.

Technical Controls

SIEMIdentity LogsEndpoint TelemetrySaaS Audit Logs

Evidence to Review

Centralized logs, alert history, retention settings, incident response records

Leadership Question

Could we determine who used an AI service, what data was involved, and when it occurred?

Demonstrate oversight

08

Key Risk

Leadership may lack consolidated reporting on AI adoption, risk, and remediation.

Technical Controls

DashboardsRisk RegistersReview CadenceExecutive Reporting

Evidence to Review

AI inventory, risk ratings, open findings, owner assignments, remediation status

Leadership Question

Can leadership see where AI is being used and where unresolved exposure remains?

Leadership

Executive Readiness Questions

Leadership should be able to answer each of the following with confidence.

  • Do we know which AI services are accessed from corporate devices and networks?
  • Can we distinguish approved enterprise AI accounts from personal accounts?
  • Do we know which AI tools have access to Microsoft 365 and other business platforms?
  • Can we identify what sensitive data is being submitted to external AI services?
  • Are AI-related OAuth permissions and integrations reviewed on a recurring basis?
  • Can we enforce AI policies by user, department, device, data type, or risk level?
  • Do we retain enough evidence to investigate an AI-related security or privacy incident?
  • Does leadership receive consolidated reporting on AI adoption, risk, and remediation?

Roadmap

Suggested Implementation Roadmap

Phase 01

Establish Visibility

  • Inventory AI applications and features
  • Identify connected systems and permissions
  • Review identity, web, DNS, and SaaS activity
  • Document business owners and use cases

Phase 02

Apply Controls

  • Define approved and restricted AI services
  • Reduce excessive application permissions
  • Apply identity, device, and data controls
  • Complete vendor security and privacy reviews

Phase 03

Maintain Oversight

  • Centralize AI-related monitoring and logs
  • Review permissions and vendors regularly
  • Track open findings and remediation
  • Report AI adoption and risk to leadership

Key Takeaway

Policy alone is not governance

Policy defines acceptable AI use, but technical controls determine whether those expectations can be observed, enforced, and verified. Effective AI governance requires identity, network, application, data protection, vendor risk, and monitoring capabilities to work together.

Put the Matrix to Work

Pair this framework with a structured assessment, or talk with L3 about the controls that make AI governance enforceable.

© L3 Networks, Inc. | AI Governance and Security Resource